this is not a celery that I've seen previously, so regret cannot join in the debate as to which of the suggested origins might be correct. Looking at the style and type of image shown on the vase, it appears to me to be un-English - almost central European in its portrayal of building type and forest surroundings, although that in itself doesn't rule out British manufacture. Do people think that the overall image and style of building carries any weight in suggesting a particular origin? - I'd suggest that British made pieces carrying scenes like this are very thin on the ground.
Is the background stippling a decorative effect found on other U.K. made celery's that have known attribution? Certainly there is frosting on British pieces - these things were made in such profusion and variety for a century or more.
Individual celery's, with panels showing different images, are known from the U.K. - one that comes to mind is Sowerby's Rd. 113560 from 13.11.1888 - and this also has frosting on the part of the panels, although unlike the op's vase the Sowerby shape is hexagonal, and the images are floral and not scenic.
As a general rule, pressed pieces were not of lead glass, or at least not the general levels of 30% - 34% found in cut glass. However, some pressed pieces will 'ring' due to their shape rather more than their content, and the bell-like shape of a celery might produce a 'ring' for the reason of its shape.
That's not to say that Sid's piece isn't a good lead-content celery - rather that pressed glass doesn't have a high lead content usually.

As a matter of interest Sid, are you able comment on the lead content generally, or otherwise, of EAPG. For example did it differ from European pressed glass?
Also just out of general interest, would like to know the extent of wear on the foot of the op's celery. However, interesting and unusual piece - a good find.
