No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

Author Topic: Small facet cut stem ruby glass - Gorge de pigeon / Gold-ruby instead  (Read 11567 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline flying free

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 12776
    • UK
This compotier is in the Hermitage Museum as 'gold-ruby' glass dated to second half 18th i.e. 1750-1800
https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/923326/?lng=en

https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/wcm/connect/4ee75aa4-8918-43cc-b2c2-06c0da03454b/WOA_IMAGE_1.jpg?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=10092626-b662-48b0-9561-307612f4625f

And also this one a slightly different colour
https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/917817/?lng=en

and this vase dated 1810-1820s
https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/802708/?lng=en

https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/wcm/connect/e2db807d-4498-49fe-b06d-ef369550a18d/WOA_IMAGE_1.jpg?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=57acba08-37be-4c2f-9fab-42f43b95c360

This bowl is just dated early 1800s
https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/802709/?lng=en
It is in the book page 86 dated first third of 19th century (that would be 1800-1833)

This decanter is the one in the book I believe (book page 72) - it appears to have identical gilding but with reverse side being shown as the one in th ebook has a medallion with initials on the front.
you need to scroll almost all the way down and it is red with a faceted stopper and gilding.
http://cultureru.com/category/russian-art-glass/


There are quite a few gold ruby items from the Russian glass collection that appear to date outside the Corning dates.  Are they all wrong?

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline Paul S.

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 9938
  • Gender: Male
as a suggestion m .......   take your glass when next you go to the V. & A. and arrange to visit on the one afternoon in the month they hold their 'surgery'  -  at least it used to be just the one afternoon per month, you can check on their web site, I think it was a Tuesday.            Hopefully they will be able to nail your glass once and for all.              Perhaps they will give you an opinion based solely on pix alone - worth a try. :)

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


Offline flying free

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 12776
    • UK
I'm not concerned at all about what my glass is made of or when any more Paul :)

No, I didn't mean that - What I mean is I honestly really don't care whether the glass is copper ruby or gold ruby ( in case you are all thinking that I'm mistakenly thinking I might have an expensive piece of glass on my hands).  i'm not, I'm sure it isn't 'expensive', but I am curious as to whether it is copper ruby or gold-ruby and whether or not it can be dated because of that.
These glasses with this cut design and the gilded design come up periodically in clear.  They are also in a very beautiful dark green glass occasionally and I think I've spotted a teal blue/green one as well.
There are always a varied selection of dates given and I've been curious to know how to date them to any sort of time frame.

I'm more concerned about the dates being quoted from Glass of the Alchemists about the time-frame production of gold-ruby glass and I'm questioning them with evidence to show why I am questioning them (the dates).  I know the people who wrote the book are glass authorities but I thought this forum was about being able to discuss glass.  And I think it is ok to question something when evidence is demonstrating something else isn't it?  The curators of the Hermitage glass collection are also authorities but perhaps they have their dates incorrect for their gold-ruby glass?

As far as I can tell the Glass of the Alchemists was produced in 2008.

I have found a more recent publication which contains very interesting and lots of,information on gold-ruby glass.
 Imperial College Press dated 2012.
It is called 'Gold Nanoparticles for Physics, Chemistry and Biology.'



https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2c-6CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA27&dq=glass+of+the+alchemists&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiLsqX8_8XMAhVCL8AKHdlRDKsQ6AEIJTAA#v=onepage&q=glass%20of%20the%20alchemists&f=false

It does not, as far as I read, give the date restrictions on the production of gold-ruby glass, that The Glass of the Alchemists is quoted as giving.
There is no reference to it not being produced between 1740 and 1835.  It says there continued to be ongoing interest in gold-ruby glass throughout the 18th century.  There is nothing in that publication unless I've missed something, that says Russia would not have been producing gold-ruby glass in the second half of the 18th century or as early as 1810 in the 19th century.

(It also states that Bernard Perrot produced items (and shows a picture) containing red gold-ruby glass in France 16 years before Kunckel, but does say that Kunckel was the first to produce gold-ruby glass en masse.)

It's just a lot less prescriptive on the date frame for the production. 

If the Hermitage production dates are incorrect I wonder why?

The publication was interesting to me as it answered one of my questions - it says the early red glass production (Egypt and Mesopotamia 1400-1300 BCE) was as a result of adding copper.
It also says
'the production of copper red glass is a real challenge from a technological point of view because it requires a reducing atmosphere; for this reason red glasses are less frequent than other colours.'


m

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline flying free

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 12776
    • UK
Another interesting comment from that book:

'Gold has such a strong colouring ability that only a minute amount is required even for the deepest colours: 100 to 1000 ppm is sufficient to produce deep pink colour glass whereas the red sang-de-bouef colour provided by copper requires a concentration a hundred times as high as gold.'

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


Offline Ivo

  • Author
  • Members
  • ***
  • Posts: 8224
  • Gender: Male
This discusson seems to be getting out of hand. On the one hand you should not believe that all descriptions of techniques are always correct, because many writers have no real technical or chemical background. Secondly,  dates tend to be estimates rather than fact based. And the fact that a technique was discovered and described did not mean it immediately went into production. Colour chemistry is predominantly a Bohemian speciality, the Russian works were alsorans. Real developers were Egermann, Bucqoy and Baccarat.
I can send you a copy of the relevant sections as soon as I am back in NL - i.e. not before the 20th.

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline flying free

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 12776
    • UK
Ivo, I am just trying to say that to put end and start dates on production is not a good thing.  And I am asking 'where is the proof of those end and start dates'?
I am not randomly questioning the information.  There is conflicting evidence.

My other comments were because that information is genuinely interesting to me.  I did wonder how early red glass was produced and asked that question at the beginning of this thread.


m

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


Offline oldglassman

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 652
  • Gender: Male
    • uk
Hi ,
            My final comments on the subject,
M you say you have conflicting "evidence",I don't think you have ,you have conflicting opinions , it seems your preferred source of information is the Hermitage , I can only ask when the attributes for the items recorded in the Hermitage were compiled , recently or when the items came to the collection which could have been more than 100 years ago , if we go to the Hermitage search facility for "Gold Ruby Glass" we will along with the examples you quote also find these,

http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/990314/?lng=en

and ,   http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/802804/?lng=en

both clearly described as Gold Ruby Glass , in fact they are  " gorge de pigeon "  French glass


https://www.bonhams.com/auctions/23557/lot/137/

then there is this

 http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/990316/?lng=en

I see no gold ruby there,

or here

http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/918951/?lng=en

and here ,

http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/digital-collection/08.+Applied+Arts/802803/?lng=en

quote "   I thought this forum was about being able to discuss glass.  And I think it is ok to question something when "evidence" is demonstrating something else isn't it?

Of course you are quite correct but again I would contest the use of the word "evidence", the  items linked to above are clearly wrongly attributed by the Hermitage , and could be very old information , personally I would then question the validity of the other entries

As this is now regarding the conflict of information then the only way for any resolution is for you to cantact both authorities and ask for the current scholarly thought , I for 1 do not have any personal experience in the subject and clearly stated" that from what I can read"and as such was passing on information from a source which I regard as current in support of your questioning the possibility that your glass may be Gold Ruby ,

http://www.cmog.org/article/gold-ruby-glass

 I was only the messenger , but now have bullet wounds

Peter.

edited to add more confusing information ,
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Early-19th-Century-Bohemian-Ruby-Gilded-Facet-Cut-Goblet-c1810-/201552569274?hash=item2eed7823ba%3Ag%3AOAcAAOSwGYVW%7EVcj&nma=true&si=84osCOOjLHJdzwJn7b18Ucgysmg%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

http://scottishantiques.com/bohemian-gilded-facet-cut-goblet?filter_name=facet%20stem#.Vy3TlSHLAcd




Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline flying free

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 12776
    • UK
Peter I'm sorry you feel like that.
My apologies.

m

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


Offline flying free

  • Members
  • **
  • Posts: 12776
    • UK
I'm very sorry if my writing again offends anyone but I am genuinely confused by the suggestion that gold-ruby glass production stopped c.1740 and didn't restart again until Pohl in c.1830s.

I am also confused about the comments that the Hermitage might have dates incorrect on all those pieces of glass.  Yes it might be that they have other information wrong re the gorge de pigeon glass (I was circumspect about one of those pieces on a thread a long time ago) but I don’t see how that brings into question their production of gold ruby glass as being outside the dates above.

I have done some searching to demonstrate why and provided the links to the information I have read as to why I am questioning it.

Please do not batter me and suggest I am adding links for the sake of it.

 I would prefer that someone explained why these links are incorrect or why my understanding is incorrect.

1) In 2011 there was a call for papers and an announcement of a conference to be held:
http://www.aihv.org/fr/SecondAnnouncement.pdf
'International Conference on the Chemistry of Glasses and Glass-Forming Melts'
Lady Margaret Hall in Oxford
in celebration of the 300th anniversary of the birth of Mikhail Vasilievich Lomonosov

As part of the commentry on that link it says:

‘ … Lomonosov was particularly interested in glass colour. He understood the importance of quantitative measurement and of the necessity to perform systematic investigations under similar conditions (temperature, atmosphere, melting time, etc.), and was the first to use a microscope in glass studies. He worked on glass for 17 years and in one period of 3½ years melted 2184 glass batches (~2 per day!). His main goal was to investigate the influence of glass composition on properties and to prepare glasses with specific properties. He produced more shades of colour (including gold ruby glass) than were then known in Europe, and introduced zinc, mercury and bismuth into glasses 130 years before Otto Schott.
Lomonosov may thus be considered the father of glass chemistry, and scientific glassmaking, and was also the founder of physical chemistry and scientific geology. Using his knowledge of coloured glasses, he personally created mosaic pictures that can still be seen in St. Petersburg.’

There is a list on that link, of the organising committee members for that conference.

As far as I have read elsewhere (iirc in the book Russian Glass of the 17th-20th Centuries), Lomonosov turned his recipes over to the Imperial glass manufactory.

2) Also in 2011, a book was produced called Glasses and the Glass Transition
By Ivan S. Gutzow, Oleg V. Mazurin, Jürn W. P. Schmelzer, Snejana V. Todorova, Boris B. Petroff, Alexander I. Priven

It says under chapter 10.4 after discussing Kunckel
‘…Then followed the second re-invention of gold ruby glass by Lomonosov [659] in the eighteenth century in St Petersburg’

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=B8JBgLcqeXUC&pg=PT538&dq=lomonosov+gold+ruby+glass&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiRi4DelsnMAhWpAsAKHRqGB-gQ6AEINTAD#v=onepage&q=lomonosov%20gold%20ruby%20glass&f=false

The authors of that book are described here on Wiley
http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-3527409688.html
as:
'Description

Written by renowned researchers in the field, this up-to-date treatise fills the gap for a high-level work discussing current materials and processes. It covers all the steps involved, from vitrification, relaxation and viscosity, right up to the prediction of glass properties, paving the way for improved methods and applications.
For solid state physicists and chemists, materials scientists, and those working in the ceramics industry
.'
The author is described thus:
'Author Information

Prof. Ivan S. Gutzow, scientist with the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, has served at research positions at various institutions, including the Universities of Jena and Rostock, Germany, and MIT and Case Western University, USA. His work, published in more than 240 papers, has earned him various awards, e.g. the 2002 International Alexander von Humboldt Research Price.
His society affiliations include the German Union of Glass Technology (DGG), and the International Commission of Glass.'

3) Then in 2012:
This paper dated 2012, was a translation of the paper
‘On the Strata of the Earth’ by Mikhail Lomonosov
there is an foreword by Irene G. Malakhova
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FRXlvOxeXMYC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=lomonosov+gold+ruby+glass&source=bl&ots=Jyjr2wH9Be&sig=mcAUFiSewnS4lYj1nPi1E-JowV0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiVm9nslMnMAhWpIsAKHeUAAzYQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=gold%20ruby%20glass&f=false

Whilst there is only part paper available to view there is again a small mention in there of gold ruby glass. (no 77 under translation)

4)
From Sotheby's there is a very long description of Lomonosov's experiments in the link below.  The description starts by saying:
'The art of coloured glass in Russia and Mikhail Lomonosov’s workshops in Ust-Ruditsa
Text by Emmanuel Ducamp
The activity of the Russian polymath Mikhail Lomonosov, his research on coloured glass and the creations by his workshops in Ust-Ruditsa are now better known thanks to the research done by Russian specialists, especially the synthesis made by L. Tarasova in the catalogue of the exhibition “Mikhail Lomonosov and the time of Elisabeth I” which took place in the Hermitage Museum in 2011.'


It also makes mention of the ruby glass coloured by gold.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FRXlvOxeXMYC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=lomonosov+gold+ruby+glass&source=bl&ots=Jyjr2wH9Be&sig=mcAUFiSewnS4lYj1nPi1E-JowV0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiVm9nslMnMAhWpIsAKHeUAAzYQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=gold%20ruby%20glass&f=false

5) And then in 2014
there was an exhibition at the State Historical Museum

There are two reference links I could find to this exhibition. 
This link writes about the exhibition and specifically about a gold-ruby cup that was gilded ‘at the turn of the 19th century.’ (i.e. c.1800 -my words) It shows a photograph of the item.  That date does not fall within the dates stated of production of ruby-glass finishing c.1740s and not restarting until c.1830s:
http://russia-insider.com/en/russian-glass-xviii-twentieth-centuries-state-historical-museum/5552

In the next link describing the exhibition the wording is for date on that piece is the same:
'For those unfamiliar with the Imperial Glass Factory, this was in operation between 1777 and 1917. The factory remained an authoritative trend setter for the art of the glass makers' craft. Among the works on exhibition, there is a rare cup of glass “gold ruby” painted at the turn of XIX century, ...'
http://our-russia.com/1991491320/russian-glass-state-historical-museum

Given all these pieces of information, and the authority of the various contributors involved, I am confused as to how it can be assumed the Hermitage has the dates completely wrong about the Imperial Glass production of gold ruby glass.
Especially since the cup shown was in an exhibition two years ago and was dated then as c.1800 - surely after all this activity on Lomonsov's work they would not get that date wrong? 

I am asking therefore, is it possible that the gold-ruby cup in the exhibition of 2014 at the State Historical museum, is correctly dated as c.1800 (i.e. the turn of the 19th century) and this therefore falls before the suggested c.1835 date for Pohl reinventing gold-ruby glass and perhaps comes under the banner of the comment in the book above of 
‘…Then followed the second re-invention of gold ruby glass by Lomonosov [659] in the eighteenth century in St Petersburg’

and likewise that it is possible there may be other gold-ruby glass items from the Imperial Glass factory in the Hermitage collection that also have the correct production dates and that fall before c1835?

Might this information also give credence to the information I quoted earlier from the book
'The Russian book says on page 46
 ''Gold had been used to produce ruby glass at the Imperial Glassworks since Lomonosov's time, and this type of glass was called "gold-ruby". '


I do understand how producing the recipe for, and producing  mosaic glass pieces of, gold-ruby glass in the mid 1700s could be different perhaps to producing blown glass large items, but I don't understand how they could be so completely wrong in their dating given the information they have at hand and that the recipes and information was handed over to the factory by Lomonosov.


I appreciate any comments as to why these linked information sources might be incorrect or might have been incorrectly interpreted by me as support that gold-ruby glass might have been produced by Russia before c.1835.
m

Support the Glass Message Board by finding a book via book-seek.com


Offline Ivo

  • Author
  • Members
  • ***
  • Posts: 8224
  • Gender: Male
Not having my papers handy, and do not want to confuse these issues any further but, from memory, :

- Ruby red was made for some time before the recipe got lost. It was first made in the 1670s by Kunckel, and the preparation of "purple of cassius" was the tricky bit. It involved cooking sulphuric and hydrochloric and dissolving gold at a speific ratio, which no one managed to do for a few hundred years. Then when the interest in coloured glass and artificial gems took off circa 1800, the recipe was re-invented and made by several glass producers.

As gold was an expensive ingredient, thinner solutions were tried out which produced cranberry in various shades - but colloidal copper turned out to be as good as colloidal gold for colouring the mass.

- colour chemistry in Russia is just that. You'd have a different outlook on the history of the world if you went to school in Russia.

Indeed the knowlege of museum curators, auction houses, antique dealers of glass chemistry is not very good. If they say 'ruby red' they usually refer to an approximate colour, not the process used to get there.  There is a lot of misinformation out there.

Support the Glass Message Board by finding glass through glass-seek.com


 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
Visit the Glass Encyclopedia
link to glass encyclopedia
Visit the Online Glass Museum
link to glass museum


This website is provided by Angela Bowey, PO Box 113, Paihia 0247, New Zealand